Want a fun diversion?
Play the budget game.
Zachary Barr of Colorado Public Radio makes it simple to understand why Colorado’s health programs and higher ed will take big hits as lawmakers slice and dice to balance the budget this year.
Posted on 28 January 2011.
Want a fun diversion?
Play the budget game.
Zachary Barr of Colorado Public Radio makes it simple to understand why Colorado’s health programs and higher ed will take big hits as lawmakers slice and dice to balance the budget this year.
Posted in Archived, Legislation, News, Public Health Issues, Vital Signs Blog0 Comments
Posted on 28 January 2011.
Christopher Bartkowicz, a Highlands Ranch man who ran a medical-marijuana-growing operation from the basement of his home, was sentenced this morning to five years in federal prison. Read the full report in the Denver Post.
Posted in Archived, Health Care Industry, News, Public Health Issues, Vital Signs Blog0 Comments
Posted on 28 January 2011.
Doctor asks, “Why did you come to the ER today?”
This question — emphasizing today is common practice in emergency departments — helps us figure out how urgent a patient’s illness might be. But it’s a loaded question. Rephrased, it could easily mean, “Do you really believe you are seriously ill, or is it just that you couldn’t wait to see a regular doctor?” Read the full report from Time.
Posted in Archived, Health Care Industry, News, Public Health Issues, Trends In Health Care, Vital Signs Blog0 Comments
Posted on 28 January 2011.
Reprinted with permission from Kaiser Health News
By Michael F. Cannon, Director of Health Policy Studies at the Cato Institute
Tomorrow night, President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union address to a chamber that just voted overwhelmingly to repeal his health care law. Before you believe anything I might have to say about that, however, there’s something you should know: I am a liar.
Just before the holidays, the fact-checking journalists at PolitiFact.com gave their Lie of the Year award to the claim that ObamaCare is a “government takeover of health care.” Backed up by the unanimous judgments of five ObamaCare supporters, PolitiFact declared that notion “simply not true,” “inaccurate,” and “ridiculously false.”
Egad, I thought. I have written entire reports calling ObamaCare a government takeover. I’ve said it on television, in op-eds, interviews and online. I was spreading the Lie of the Year!
ObamaCare is not a government takeover, I learned from PolitiFact, because it “uses the private health insurance system to expand health care coverage.”
But wait. In my research, I found that distinction between public and private to be illusory: what difference is there between a public system where the government taxes and spends your money, and a “private” system where the government forces you to spend your money in the same way?
“It is irrelevant,” I wrote, “whether we describe medical resources (e.g., hospitals, employees) as ‘public’ or ‘private.’ What matters – what determines real as opposed to nominal ownership – is who controls the resources.” I detailed how making private health insurance compulsory – as ObamaCare does – “would give government as much control over the nation’s health care sector as a compulsory government program.”
I even quoted President Obama’s health adviser Jeanne Lambrew, who acknowledges, “the government role in socialized medicine systems ranges from complete government ownership and salaried facilities and providers to public financing of private insurance and providers” (emphasis added) – which is exactly how ObamaCare operates.
Were these lies too? We may never know: PolitiFact failed to consider whether the public/private distinction might be misleading.
Fortunately, others have. Left-leaning columnist Michael Kinsley wrote of ObamaCare: “If the government requires insurers to accept all customers and charge all the same price, regulates all aspects of their marketing to make sure they aren’t discriminating, and then redistributes the profits to make sure that no company gets penalized unfairly, in what sense is the industry still ‘private’?”
The Congressional Budget Office wrote that if ObamaCare’s minimum “medical-loss ratio” requirement were just 5 percentage points higher, private insurance would become “an essentially governmental program.”
This “government takeover” business wasn’t the first time PolitiFact warned me about telling lies.
After Sarah Palin’s (in)famous “death panels” bombshell, I wrote – take a deep breath, now – that what she said was actually quite plausible. President Obama had justproposed a government panel that, under standard principles of administrative law, would have the power to ration medical care just as Palin predicted. For support, I quoted a former Medicare administrator and other Medicare scholars.
When PolitiFact dubbed “death panels” their Lie of the Year for 2009, I presented their fact-checkers with this potentially exculpatory evidence. They showed no interest.
From my vantage point, the evidence shows that ObamaCare is a government takeover of health care, and Sarah Palin’s “death panels” claim was essentially true. If that makes me Liar of the Year, so be it.
But another way to look at it is this: PolitiFact has now misappropriated this award for two years in a row. Not only is each of these “lies” factually true, but – and this is more important – the people who made those statements believe them to be true, which means they fall short of the dictionary definition of a lie: “An assertion of something known or believed by the speaker to be untrue with intent to deceive.“ There is simply no factual basis – and no excuse – for calling them lies.
PolitiFact’s Lie of the Year award has proven as conducive to civil discourse as Rep. Joe Wilson’s, R- S.C., dyspeptic “You lie!” outburst during one of President Obama’s previous addresses to Congress. Rather than continue to poison the well by dispensing another award this year, PolitiFact should just let it lie.
Michael F. Cannon is director of health policy studies at the Cato Institute and coauthor of Healthy Competition: What’s Holding Back Health Care and How to Free It.
Posted in Archived, News, Public Health Issues, Trends In Health Care, Vital Signs Blog0 Comments
Posted on 27 January 2011.
Governors have deep differences over national health-care reform, but when it comes to insurance exchanges–a centerpiece of the sprawling new federal law intended to make it easier for individuals and small businesses to shop for comparable coverage–nearly every state is moving ahead with implementation. They are working under crushing deadlines, often with staffs thinned by layoffs. Read the report from Stateline.
Posted in Archived, Legislation, News, Vital Signs Blog0 Comments
Posted on 27 January 2011.
The emotional health of college freshmen — who feel buffeted by the recession and stressed by the pressures of high school — has declined to the lowest level since an annual survey of incoming students started collecting data 25 years ago. Read the New York Times report.
Posted in Archived, Health and Wellness, Mental Health, News, Public Health Issues, Vital Signs Blog0 Comments
Posted on 27 January 2011.
Two of the central promises of President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul law are unlikely to be fulfilled, Medicare’s independent economic expert told Congress on Wednesday. The landmark legislation probably won’t hold costs down, and it won’t let everybody keep their current health insurance if they like it, Chief Actuary Richard Foster told the House Budget Committee. Read the Associated Press story.
Posted in Archived, Legislation, News, Vital Signs Blog0 Comments
Posted on 26 January 2011.
The Houston hospital where Rep. Gabrielle Giffords is being treated is one of the few hospitals in the country using cognitive rehabilitation therapy. The Pentagon’s health program, Tricare, has refused to cover cognitive rehabilitation therapy for the tens of thousands of service members who have suffered brain injuries in the line of duty. Read the report from ProPublica.
Posted in Archived, News, Trends In Health Care, Vital Signs Blog1 Comment
Posted on 26 January 2011.
Federal health officials announced Wednesday that they were investigating a possible association between saline and silicone gel-filled breast implants and very rare form of cancer known as anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Read the Washington Post report.
Posted in Archived, Health and Wellness, Medical Research, News, Vital Signs Blog0 Comments
Posted on 26 January 2011.
By Katie McCrimmon
Colorado lawmakers are targeting $50 million from the hospital provider fee to fund Medicaid spikes as the state faces a billion-dollar budget shortfall this year.
The themes of this year’s legislative session will likely be creative budget dances like the dip into the provider fee, and cuts, cuts and more cuts. Lawmakers must balance the budget and are considering slashing everything from the popular school breakfast program for poor children to pet programs for veterans, the unemployed and other interest groups.
During a Joint Budget Committee briefing with both the Senate and House health committees last week, Rep. Cheri Gerou, R-Evergreen, said “some of us are not sleeping at night” as lawmakers contemplate cuts. She urged fellow lawmakers to hunt for their own methods to trim the budget and ferret out government-funded health programs that don’t work.
The biggest health care bill coming in the 2011 session will be the one that establishes Colorado’s health exchange, the centerpiece of the new federal Affordable Care Act. Colorado is planning a statewide exchange, which will be a health insurance marketplace where individuals and small businesses can shop for insurance options by 2014.
This year, the state legislature will set up the framework for the exchange and appoint an oversight board. Tension is building now in Colorado’s split legislature; so far, the exchange bill doesn’t appear to be controversial. But watch for sharp divisions of opinion down the road as everyone from health companies and insurance brokers to advocates for the poor fights for a piece of the exchange action.
Solutions gives you an introduction to health-related bills on deck so far.
The Hospital Provider Fee: eradicate it or use it as a piggy bank?
The 2011 session opened with newly-elected Rep. Janek Joshi, a Republican former physician from Colorado Springs, firing a shot for budget slashers. Joshi introduced HB-11-1025, a bill to eradicate the hospital provider because he sees it as a tax and is concerned about the ballooning federal deficit.
The provider fee law passed in Colorado in 2009. Under it, hospitals throughout the state pay fees, which the federal government then matches. The money then flows back to the hospitals to fund care for the poor and to boost enrollment in public health programs for poor adults, pregnant women and children.
So far, Colorado’s Department of Health Care Policy and Financing estimates that the provider fee generated more than $146 million in new federal funds for Fiscal Year 2009-2010. It’s expected to result in more than $159 million in federal money for the current fiscal year. When the law is fully implemented, hospitals in Colorado will pay about $600 million annually and the federal government will provide an equal match, bringing $1.2 billion into the program.
For now, the Colorado Hospital Association has signed on to a plan to use $50 million from the provider fees this year and $25 million next year to help counteract hikes in Medicaid costs. The fees would draw the federal match, bringing a total of $100 million this year and $50 million next year.
This plan would require new legislation that has not been introduced yet.
Former Gov. Bill Ritter’s budget experts hatched the plan. Gov. John Hickenlooper has spoken out in support of the hospital provider fee in general, but hasn’t commented on the specific maneuvers being considered now.
Steven Summer, president and CEO of the Colorado Hospital Association, said tapping excess money from the provider fees makes sense.
“Our board of trustees and members believe that when you have a billion dollar deficit, everybody has a responsibility in fixing that,” Summer said. “For a defined period of time and a defined dollar amount, it can help pay for the growth in Medicaid.”
Aside from Rep. Joshi, most other lawmakers on both sides of the aisle seem to like the provider fee and are eager to find solutions to budget problems, which are especially severe in the health arena.
Costs for Colorado’s Medicaid program have risen over $1 billion from 2007 to 2010. The increases stem primarily from a 41 percent spike in the number of people needing Medicaid and a 47 percent increase in the number of clients in the Children’s Basic Health Plan.
Colorado’s Medicaid program serves low-income elderly people and disabled adults and children. While the majority of the clients in the program are children, the majority of expenditures go towared programs for the elderly and the disabled.
Sen. Betty Boyd, D-Lakewood, chair of the Senate’s Health and Human Services Committee, supports tapping the $50 million from the provider fee.
“The hospitals have come forward and they are willing to do this. With the tight times we’re in, I don’t think we should pass up this opportunity. Let’s be good stewards of this money,” Boyd said.
So far, the fee has added about 30,000 previously uninsured people to Colorado’s Medicaid rolls and it has helped Colorado hospitals bear the burden of caring for the indigent.
In all, Summer said Colorado hospitals covered more than $1.7 billion in uncompensated care in 2009. Before passage of the hospital provider fee program, hospitals had to cover 44 percent of the costs for Medicaid patients. That number has dropped to about 29 percent and many more hospitals are able to operate in the black now they have funds from the federal match.
The fact that the provider fee can bring federal money to the state during an economic crisis means that Joshi’s bill may never get out of committee. Stay tuned.
Colorado’s new health exchange
While national politicians continue to debate the new health law, Colorado lawmakers are moving forward to implement it. Democrats in the governor’s office and the statehouse are working to find a Republican sponsor in the House to build bipartisan support for Colorado’s new health exchange.
Sen. Boyd, is sponsoring the legislation and said a draft of the measure should be complete by Feb. 10.
“We’re setting up a framework and the process for putting the board together so they can get started on the creation of the health exchange,” Boyd said.
She anticipates that the board will have nine members. The legislature will then authorize the board to map out the details of the health exchange. They will do this under the direction of Joan Henneberry, Hickenlooper’s architect for the health exchange, who will be based at the Colorado Health Institute as the exchange takes shape.
Boyd said the legislation will prevent people with conflicts of interest from serving on the board. So, for instance, current health insurance executives or insurance brokers would not be allowed on the board, although they could serve on advisory committees.
“Perhaps a retiree would be fine,” said Boyd “But we are being cautious about current conflicts of interest.”
Lorez Meinhold, Hickenlooper’s director of health reform implementation, said there is consensus among stakeholders that Colorado should have one statewide exchange. It will need to gear up to serve about 300,000 people.
While working previously for Ritter, Meinhold released a roadmap on health care implementation and results of community forums on health care called Stakeholder Perspectives.
Dede De Percin, executive director for the Colorado Consumer Health Initiative, said the health exchange will be like an online shopping mall for health insurance. She hopes the exchange will give consumers choice and competitive pricing.
“Once you build the exchange, if you know that you have four basic plans, then you’ll be able to find out about the insurance carriers, service, and value,” de Percin said. “It should give small insurance companies the chance to be more competitive.”
She said Republicans, including President Bush, pioneered the concept of a competitive insurance marketplace, so it shouldn’t be difficult to get Colorado’s GOP lawmakers on board.
“I think there’s a lot of common ground and that we’ll be able to move forward,” de Percin said.
The health exchange will continue to take shape over the next two years, requiring new legislation each year.
“We expect that it will be an incremental process,” said Ben Price, executive director for the Colorado Association of Health Plans. “What we really need in Colorado this year is a bill that enables the state to start working on the exchange. We’re lucky we have a few years to work out all the issues.
Curbing concussions and making hospitals safer
Among the other health issues likely to emerge in the legislature:
Posted in Archived, Featured, Health Care Industry, Legislation, News1 Comment
Social Widgets powered by AB-WebLog.com.